Yesterday evening I visited a friend in the Rhineland. I drove the A4 from Olpe towards Cologne and it was unlimited there appeared a GT2 and I thought to myself: Look at a playmate. So we played over 30km formation flight with all possible light signs, then the beetle driver had to get out, still thanked for playing and I flew further. Then shortly before Cologne a 120 limitation sign appeared and I immediately took the foot off the gas and left the car I had 210 on the speedometer at the time. As far as I know, there is no law regulating how far to be flashed after a limitation. It is also not unusual for the municipalities to improve the cash register by mobile control units behind the entrance sign. Only I am of the opinion here one should differentiate. From speed 100, or 70 to 50 to throttle down at shield sight. This is not a problem, but if you come from an unlimited motorway area into a limitation zone, this is quite critical depending on the speed you drive. If you are travelling at 300km/h for example and see the 200m remote limitation plate, you have no chance to reach the required maximum speed in time with a normal braking process. You would have to carry out a risk braking or full braking in order to achieve the desired maximum speed in time. And that stands for me in the diametrical contrast to road safety! A full braking in the middle of the motorway without visible danger? What would it look like in the opposite case? Let’s take the beetle driver not have left the train before 20km, but would have divided my distance and would have been behind me. Now I would put a full braking in the unlimited area when recognizing the limitation sign, since I must be in time to the sign at speed 120. driver reacts too late and there is a small tin damage. Would the beetle driver have the fault or would I have a partial debt because I put down a full brake without any apparent danger?