Moderation and comprehensibility

Hello community. Today I have created a topic for the first time in a long time. I wanted to inquire about possible regulations regarding a show car building, which is not intended for the road. In V&S forum there are several topics that deal with similar questions about regulations. The moderator Golfeszorn has closed the topic immediately and in my opinion completely unfounded and submits to me my reference that it was not intended for road traffic i st, untrue be and she “do not give any help for such a thing” Per PN he then referred me to the NUB, well, I have read it, but in it I also find nothing that violates my contribution. In the contribution rules just as little wanting to build a showcar is neither illegal nor illegitimate, offensive, or anything else. I also did not ask how to design the conversion. I did not ask how to make and airbags or anything else. I wanted to be single I would like to ask if there are legal regulations for vehicles that will not participate in public road transport, which we should take into account during the conversion. Golfeszorn also owes me, on request, an explanation, against which my contribution should be the violations. I have been here for 9 years and have enjoyed the mostly good and informative climate here. But I think, if a topic is closed, it should be a comprehensible basis that is not based on unreserved insinuations. n based give. Best regards Texasdriver