Hello together, we have the following problem: on 11.01.2012 my Göga had an accident at 8:10h. He was on the front road and from a side road came a sprinter from the left. This first stood (!) and then drove off suddenly to cross the intersection. The front road on which Göga was located is at this place a bridge, so Göga came out quasi *from above* or behind the cup. This cup is however about 100 meters from the side road, one can from do As a result, our beautiful Mary was totally damaged *hoil*. At the scene of the accident, the opponent blamed me completely because he (literally) “did not look to the right” (i.e. the direction came from the Göga). Since the accident was only a few meters away from our house, Göga got me to it. I could see for myself that the opponent was totally overtired, so in my opinion it is doubtful that he was even able to make a mistake. However, neither the admission of guilt nor the clearly visible fatigue of the driver can be found in the police protocol. (I am also not sure whether this was not intentionally taken up by the police officer, he probably knows the wife of the opponent of the accident) After some time the opposing insurance now wants to take over only 75% of the damage (also of the car rental and expert costs they want to take over only 75%) because Göga no Lich t had turned on (official sunrise was on that day 8:18h). Can they do that even though your client is to blame? If he had looked to the right he would also have seen Göga coming. No matter if light on or not, it was practically daylight at this time and the intersection is neither installed nor standing trees around which would have hindered the view. Since I have so slowly doubted the abilities of our lawyer I wanted to ask you for your opinion. I thank you already in the ahead for your answers. cu tiggy