Hello everyone read here for a long time with me, but I have registered now because a few questions (general and special) open up to me. I have never had a partial cascade damage (or something at all in the way). Now it was time and I have some questions (especially to the specialists here), which I hope to get answered. Important: it is still a bit open and desh. I do not want to (yet) reveal everything here. Hope that is ok and stands for an answer of the For the time being, I have understood what “WBW” and “RW” means. Damage event: TK/real total damage, is 3 weeks back, insurance provides evaluators. While I initially assumed that all costs for this (expert) will be covered by the insurance, I now had to learn that I have to cover both towing costs (in a workshop with lifting platform) and storage costs. Is that correct, yes? Furthermore: The workshopi nhaber told me, “From the day of the review by the expert, I have to pay the stand costs. Is that so? Since the report is not yet available to me (can only guess why it lasts so long), I still do not know any data relevant to me, except the residual value. This is very low. Here is the next question(s): Basically it says, low residual value is good and I mean, in view of the damage, but also realistic, it is also (vehicle is destroyed – unrenewable Since I now have to pay stand costs every day, I consider the fast sale (data residual value exchange is available to me), but am still uncertain whether I can act in such a way with a TK damage!? Data comes from the expert, think so!? Or? Furthermore, I read here always from, “your property”, “must not sell”, etc., but then the next comes around the corner and weathers „enrichment fraud”. But with the small residual value come completely automatically But on the other hand, there is no risk of wanting to enrich me (as well as this nonsense, in case of loss), but also not to get a higher RW presented by the insurance company in two weeks! Is this a 50:50 decision on my part? Otherwise, I would have had the thought to keep it myself. Is this a 50:50 decision on my part? Otherwise, I would have had the thought to keep it myself. The RW to keep a few parts and then scrap the rest afterwards!? Which then also went quite smoothly over the stage (I think). But is that possible at all? Or is this excluded because of total damage/TK damage? In this context, I would like to insert 1-2 quotations here, which I have found here in the last days: „These – by the way known – 30 or 60 Euro residual values are only given, so that the adjustment amount of 20.82 is triggered “The cars are then with collecttr “In time there are, of course, stand money costs, which have to be paid at the time of collection. The pick-up person does not pay them and then drives on. “Here I tend already to leave my fingers off it. However, since in the case of another interested party (then through the insurance), anyway, I am well (better) advised to leave him at the same time. buy – right!? If stress, then the one with lower RW. Or just let it be scrapped after all? Continued: I asked the insurance company and the expert to want to be part of the review, that was agreed, but was then ignored. This is for me in particular not at all, since I wanted to go into the state of preservation before the damage (invoices, checkbook, equipment, fines etc.), but this could not now. Vehicle is older, but rather popular, f A lot of new parts have just been installed and new Tüv! The expert now knows nothing about all this (except Tüv). Now it is for example also the case that the air conditioning does not appear in the VIN query, why, however, the car has one from the factory. To what extent are already “problems” in the evaluation/assessment preprogrammed here? Should there be “burdens” at the WWW (e.g. air conditioning), to what extent can the already sold (then) at the (then) already sold On request, the expert did not call me a WWW. Is that because he was commissioned by the insurance company? Is this related to the low RW? Many questions, many thoughts, hope someone will enlighten me here. Thank you for your efforts.