A friendly hello to the forum and the workshop, I noticed this article in the insurance forum here:http://www.motor-talk.de/…/…-auf-lkw-uebernahmen-t5955004.html?… A first contribution of the “user” VHV in the name of the VHV. If it had only arrived to the “user” VHV for a help for the local TE, he could have made the via PN halfway NUB-compliant. But that is now somewhat different in the room. This company was mentioned in the context only marginally and it was A PN of the VHV instead of a posting of the same content would certainly have helped the user as well. As it now stands it is free PR and thus marketing in the user area. If I have read this correctly in older posts, this was on MT so far a red cloth. Is this a new line of MT, to which one should adjust as a “normal” user in the sense of NUB No.2.1? The VHV is certainly not such a nuclei. tzer, since she herself is not capable of action and/or business. Only her representative bodies under company law are that and indeed as a natural person. To prejudge the question: yes, I don’t want to have such a thing in the user area. I don’t know if I am so alone with my attitude to this. That’s why I am putting this here for discussion and looking forward to factual arguments and opinions pro and contra. And now gentleman(wo)men, start your engines!