Bad experience in the car purchase or aftersales service of Carpark / Sixt (sixt daughter): 4.5 year old Skoda Superb with 89,000 km bought. After almost 5 months the gearbox gives up the spirit and has to be completely replaced. Damage of 5.500 EUR. Addressed to material defects liability of the dealer the argument runs just as follows: – car had driven at risk transfer (= purchase), in addition, one would now see no obligation on the part of Carpark since irge I would have been able to buy an extended warranty from Carpark. Now, unfortunately, there is nothing else to do for me. – to the liability for material defects or the subject matter of reversal of the burden of proof, is first repeated above and by the way, I should have understood, even if he (sale manager of the branch in Frankfurt) would perhaps even see the privately similar, it would be clear that he now has the interests of Carpark maximally vert After a written request to improve and set the deadline of more than 2 weeks, you have to check the case and the estimate of the cost of your own technicians and claim that this must have happened because of the misuse of me. Incidentally, I have driven a lot in a really short time and therefore you can do nothing. On my objection, that this is true with the kilometers, but he has to realize that with these routes one has to largely in 6th place. In the meantime Skoda himself explained himself kulantly and finally takes over almost half of the repair costs. To this the car park employee explained relatively unwoundly then, that one had checked “Kulanz” also internally, but one would not assume after such a damage now anyway, that I would ever buy from Carpark again. Therefore one would be there there This rather adventurous view of customer service and quality promises makes sure that the prejudice “needed car dealer” is confirmed once again and with the “never buy more” the employee is certainly right by now. I think in itself that there can be a problem everywhere, it always depends on how a company deals with it. But maybe I have a problem with it. This is why I am forced to reject all of this argument and to hope that the customer will make any formal mistake, which would allow Carpark to take full responsibility. I am forced to advance money and to spend a precious lifetime on this, and that it will be possible for Carpark to take full responsibility for the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage caused by the damage to the damage caused by the damage to the damage. In the end, the case is now with the lawyer and it will clear up about this way who gets right in the end. All things that I had hoped that this would not happen to me at a “big” and supposedly professional dealer like Carpark. For me in no case ever again. At least here the car park employee will be right.