The star was stolen from an old W124 combi 2 weeks ago. It wasn’t the first time, but now they didn’t just break the star, but they pulled it out standing on the hood. Besides the hip-wide footprints and bumps on the bonnet, not only he is missing from the star – also the ball bearing under the grille is gone. Insurance (HP and TK) says that the star would be theft, but the rest would fall under vandalism. The hotline did not want to follow the damage as a result of the theft, nor did it help to discuss with the person concerned. Of course, I can also understand that they want to keep the damage off their backs, but here it is not only the star (which I have always paid privately) but also sheet metal. In the case of a radio claw, the destroyed glass would be insured by the TK (but only because it is glass and specifically listed in the insurance conditions). but claim that the destroyed glass does not fall under the insured parts of the TK, but is also to be understood as theft sequence. Therefore, the logic in case of sheet metal damage should not grip, or ? In my view, this is the theft with damage consequences – is there something legally valid ? I would hate to run glecih to the RA, but to write a letter to my verse . Thanks and much success in the stomach recovery…