Hello I have the following problem I got on 31.01.09 a back right into the car culprit question was no problem and I also got quite quickly from the opposing insurance a write that the damage is taken over in the ramen of your entry obligation so I’m dekra to make an opinion what then arrived the day before yesterday as duplicate also with me and today I get from the dekra a 2nd report in which stands “wie mit Herrn … vom VVD(gegenderische Versicherung) am 17 .02.09 discussed by phone replaces this opinion the opinion with the nr: … from 13.02.09 since in this an incorrect calculation was included so I compared the opinions with each other the damage is still equal: main damage area the vehicle was damaged in the rear area right damage description the rear thruster is scraped on the right side and moved upwards the right rear side part is inserted in the area in front of the closing light but now it is obviously a cheaper solution opinion 1 (in case of wage calculation) bumper h replace (decomposed) side wall r replaces includes: seat bench side panels side windows bumper rear light and sky off/installation does not include: fuel tank disassembly/installation and now the abbreviated version in the 2nd opinion time supplement to a main position bumper h replace (decommissioned) back light fixture r/e install page wall repair additional changes in the 2nd opinion sin still that the costs for the page wall (because of repair) fall away the paint works are cheaper and where before a value improvement of 250 euro stands see nothing anymore and now I should not get any more amount x but rather quite exactly the half of total x what do you think about it all goes with right things and I have to have stood with the repair or can be on e in the exchange