Hello, as you all know, there are navs with warning function when stationary speed cameras are approaching. In general it is said that the stationary speed cameras are in dangerous places, where often too fast is driven. Thus one wants to bring the drivers to the proper driving. So far so good. That I think that the things largely serve the cash register filling, does not matter. If these devices really are to serve the traffic safety, then why are the bl I mean you can see it that way, if I know that there is a speed camera at this point, then I don’t drive too fast to not be flashed. So you have lowered the general accident risk at the place. But fine or something is not collected. If you don’t have a speed camera warning, you run the risk of rattling in there, for example, if 50 meters behind a 70s sign is a starry box, and you drive maybe 92km/h (just one hour). So, one was clearly too fast, has increased the risk of accidents, in case of a case one might not have been able to slow down in time and the like. So, but the fine is going on, and that just goes to the cash register from the circle, or country, however. So, I am convinced that the lightning alarms are forbidden because, if they were allowed, one of course does not drive too fast, and the county (or the one who collects the money) is not allowed to move too fast. You can say, of course, that you want to ensure that the drivers always drive according to the rules…….. But if the road safety would REALLY be in the foreground and would not be a hypocritical justification, then the speedometer alarms would be allowed, because, as I said, you would not drive too fast in the dangerous places. I would like to hear your opinions about it. See that too or what Do you think about it ? Greetings