Hello After a liability damage, driven against my parking vehicle, I commissioned an expert to draw up an expert report. In the report a replacement value of 3800€ is given and the residual value of 1379€. Since an account should be made on an expert basis the invoice looks as follows: WWW – RW The payment amount is therefore 2421€ The insurance company informed me in the letter and specifies the replacement value with 3400€, i.e. 400€ difference. n personally to the insurance and see there, a typing error (who believes) But now it is in the letter of the insurance that the evaluator costs were taken over only partially. Asked about this and I was told that the HUK (the opposing insurance) will settle after the fee tableau 2012 or these costs are considered reasonable. The evaluator invoice amounts to 735€ The reperture costs amount to net 3174.43€ According to the table of HUK the invoice of the Gu tachters with 574,95€ appropriate. Difference: 160,04€ The insurance will not pay the expert, does this now come to me? Is the fee tableau of the Huk at all right? Damage amount is now actually what, the reperture costs net or the resuscitation value in a fictitious billing on an expert basis? Thank you very much……