Hello, I looked at a very well-kept Ford C-Max today. 2013 year of construction, mileage at 75000km. I really had a good impression on me, both inside, outside, and in the engine compartment (but definitely no expert). However, I did not look at the car from below on a stage or the like, would have made only limited sense (no idea and comparison experience). I then took a few mobile phone photos, two are attached, My Question: Is the rust to be seen on the pictures “in the frame”, so suitable for age and mileage, or is that too much? My (still) current car is 17 years old and looks much worse below, but that’s not the question here. I just lack any experience as I said, so I would be grateful for an assessment of whether it fits that way for a 2013 year of construction.