Hello, every now and then it is quite nice to taste in the car picture, especially if something is written about Saab. Of course I don’t expect so much from AB now, but what is to be read in issue 6 has led me to a letter from the reader:Dear ladies and gentlemen, I have read your current car picture edition a little irritated. Unfortunately, some mistakes have crept in with your information about the brand Saab. On page 58 you write that with Saab no H On page 23, however, it can be read that the 9-5II is a hybrid in planning. Moreover, your statement about the biopower models is not understandable. If ethanol is obtained from plant mass, then it is a CO2-neutral type of drive and is therefore significantly superior to any other type of drive, including hybrid drive, in terms of CO2 emissions globally. Also, no Opel engines are installed in Saab models. eim 2.0t-Motor around GM-Motorblock, which was “edited” and further developed by Saab (e.g. Trionic 8). Thus Saab stands out more independently than e.g. Audi in the VW-Verbund. Moreover, the Saab 9-3 is not also a Opel Vectra with other bodywork, but Saab only uses the same GM-Platform. It would be nice if you would stop your negative representation of Saab and would perhaps report a little more objectively about the brand. also not constantly from VW, even if the similarities between Audi and BMW are much stronger than with Saab and Opel. With kind regards a bit embarrassing. I don’t expect you to get well-founded information now. In the meantime, you can find out much better on the Internet, so that car newspapers are no longer so necessary. Sad is that car image itself contradicts and always uses the same false clichés. For Saab it is just that in every used car special issue the Saab 9-3 is represented as Opel Vectra with other bodywork. One can probably not bear that the car overall cuts off quite well.