Moin, so with me the NM is wrong in the diagram, one would have to recognize immediately. The test bench was converted shortly before and the NM calculation in the all-wheel test was something wrong. The PS were considered as KW so to speak. Will not now again on it. The of my Burder has the system of LODER under it with Sportkat… same performance as the series ST. Of course now have no previous-after comparison, but 30ps more as of Loder times claimed are guaranteed not have here something before itet. Images, videos, data etc…MeasurementST Power 218.8 PS @ 6339 U/min correct 222.1 PS @ 6339 U/min Rotation 351 NM max @ 6339 U/min Loss less. 39 PS shortly after the STs…. WRX, I find quite a lot Ultimate or so was NOT in the tank. If there is no difference to the normal SP, just want to say. Power 243.2 PS @ 5597 U/min correct 246.9 PS @ 5597 U/min Rotation edit wrongly calculated Loss less. 73 PS as soon as I look at the 6000 revolutions here, pulls the focus better, because then the power is still rising or there is still a gear to select…. If you insert the difference in the loss power into a diagram, you can see it even more clearly e.g. : XLS file are hopefully enough info P.S. No one of the tested believe anything but the difference from the WRX to the ST would have to come along then I’m just thinking about it, one knows how to calculate the torque, it seems funny to me… MfG peter