Hello, in another thread was about the “seriosity”, called “defectlessness” of auto tests. That always little things are mixed up, we must live with it. In this posting it is about the price presentation and about test reports in general. “Previous” I was once a fan of the AMS. Physically, detailed, relatively neutral. Then at the beginning of the 90s an extreme VW-Euphrorie started. Also the test reports become increasingly scarce, more and more wischi-waschi and In spite of all attempts to be neutral, I also find the comparison of the prices in comparison tests extremely banal. In addition, the “predictability of the VTs on the pointer. If a VW or an Audi is present, it wins, because of the “value change”. If this, the Seat or Skoda wins. Not German cars are always much worse. Often it is also the case that a car in the individual test is still quite good, but in the VT is completely “ironed”. And quite obviously h The AMS editors are shot at the new 7s. So nobody can use it. The quite similar, IMHO not easier to use A8 is better about classes. At the time I like the mot quite much. Also car goes like that. The mot tries an exact, data-controlled equipment opposite, very commendable. As example I call the VT from the 24/2001 S60 against c-Class and X-Type. The AB* as VW-Hauspostille, however, I consider as “informationless, but maintenance ame reading” at a kiosk. How are you? Which magazines are available in the other countries? Jürgen