F1 engine crankshaft

Hello! Have a question to the technology experts: A few years ago, when the cylinder number was limited from 10 to 8, an F1 engine developer in the MSA reported that there were problems with the now stronger engine vibrations. I conclude that 180° cranked waves (flat plane) were used, which cause very strong mass forces 2nd order. Because waves with 90° potting (cross plane) have a significantly better mass balance (no free forces 1st and 2nd order, very low moments by conrod width), I wonder why this design was not used. Can someone please tell me something!? Greeting Sven