Hello, I just had a little accident. And I wanted to park in a supermarket parking lot from the parking space backwards to the right. I was already about 3/4 outside when I noticed a car from the left. I braked of course and at the moment I came to the stand (that could have been only a few centimeters) it already popped. Balance: On my car fortunately only the rear left corner is scratched, on the other vehicle are scratches from the front left to the rim The fender is literally flaked. We then brought the police, which took everything and meant, alone because of the fact that I drove backwards, I would be to blame (special duty of care). But can you really say this so flatly ? Who parks backwards is automatically to blame ? 100% ? I am interested in this now especially from an insurance technical point of view ! The expected 30 € fines are not important to me At the time of the accident, the parking lot was icy and very smooth (was also taken up by the police), which is why I drove very slowly and stopped 1-2 times in between to look around. A quick drive and “shoot” out of the parking space was not possible at all. At the last look I saw that another car was parked on the left of me. My accident opponent later said that he had waited behind and had him parked. After that he was only but since I was almost outside and he was driving on the opposite track, he must have seen me and could have evaded, brake or honked me? My guess is that he could not do anything anymore because of the smoothness and slipped into me. Although my neutrality is probably disturbed, but from the traces of the accident he drove against me and scratched me for about 1 meter. Am I going to drive further and could not do anything more… still 100% guilty ? Wasn’t there even a 50:50 rule in such accidents in private parking spaces ? My insurance is unfortunately only reachable on Monday and my blood pressure is rising again…