https://www.motor-talk.de/…/…hr-von-honestjohn-co-uk-t6044271.html Where exactly in my post is * stupid polemic * sticking around ? And what is it made clear that I am not in any way objective or interested in a meaningful exchange? (apart from the fact that I am not obliged to objectivity like all users here) Quite seriously, I have been looking for a database with known defects and where the mod wants to know that I am already the one of honestjohn before 12 Mona I don’t know, but maybe I forgot them, but I think that’s unlikely, because I’m very interested in extensive reliability data. But it doesn’t matter; forgetfulness can’t be a reason to drive me like this and close the thread. The allegations are simply completely unstoppable. If you look at my blog or read all my posts, you know of course my opinion that many manufacturers want to turn on an overpriced garbage. But I didn’t mention certain manufacturers in the above-mentioned factual post, nor did I say a valuation. I would have been happy if I had had this database already during my car purchases, in order to really know what you have to pay attention to when buying used goods, for example, then you can ask “was xy already exchanged?” etc. Why can’t you talk about it in the purchasing consultation forum? It is undisputed that the knowledge about it is absolutely meaningful; motor-talk writes in the used cars However, this is also the case for the well-known shortcomings.