V&S Rules of the Game, among others: “It is discussed factually about the topic opened by the threader. Who has nothing objective to contribute, leaves the fingers off the keyboard! Off-topic and spam contributions are deleted without comment, and who continues to post nonsense despite better knowledge risks a 36h lock or ultimately the banishment. This applies especially to „I’m getting popcorn!!” Moderator posts in the forum (public): “And what has this senseless waste of space? with the actual topic? Nix…” User (me) explains to the mod that the posting has to do with the topic in detail, and if he doesn’t care, he can ignore the posting after all (somewhat pointedly formulated, but after the public, personal attack – and OT – quite appropriate).And what does the mod do: “And I like to explain to you again the rules of the V&S, which are pinned at the top. However, this will not run over a PN, but quite simply and inconspicuously over a little break of 36h for your account.” …public, in the forum. I quote the game rule again: “It is objectively discussed about the topic opened by the threader. Who has nothing objective to contribute, leaves the fingers off the keyboard!” Two complete and comprehensive rule violations by the MOD – ZACK – the user should be blocked. That’s how it should work? Do the rules apply to the mod, or not? Or are MODs authorized, in case of personal non-failure a posting to publicly attack users (“senseless waste of storage space”, factually incorrect (would have nothing to do with the subject), and if the user refuses to block the user?