Hello, when driving over a green traffic light I bumped into another car, which drove over “red”; both vehicles suffered a total damage. Luckily no one was injured. Despite independent testimony in my favour + further evidence, the opponent denies having seen “red” and insists on having driven over “green”. The further procedure for me is clear: turn on lawyer, clarify in doubt before court (let). What happens to the damage control (or reimbursement of replacement costs)? Does my VK pay my damage and the opposing VK the damage? Or does my HP pay for its damage and vice versa? Thank you for your answers and greetings.