Hello, in order not to blow up the roller forum here my question: many scooter drivers claim that the BE is extinguished by tuning does not lead to a loss of HP, on the basis of §28 VVG. I, on the other hand, believe that this is a fraudulent deception at the conclusion of the contract and not a simple increase in risk. In addition, in my opinion, a self-inflicted accident ALWAYS is connected with a lack of driving licence and non-traffic vehicle. If the insurance is covered by insurance, however, the insurance can remain harmless up to 500€. That this interpretation is of course wrong is clear. According to the PVG, the insurer has to enter first, which only serves the victim protection and does not mean that a valid insurance contract exists. Furthermore, I could neither find the Regersslimit nor seems logical to me. According to me, the insurance of a tuned scooter is a fraudulent deception (in case of damage) Even fraud) of the UN. The contract is thus ineffective (at least floating) Ergo: violation of the PVG on the part of the UN no insurance protection! Please do not make any assertions which are not verifiable, of which there is sufficient in the scooter forum. It is also relevant for cars, although here probably a fair margin of play is given (whether LEDs in the spotlights actually significantly impair road safety is to be seen, this is the case with performance-enhancing scooters (a) the following conditions shall be met: