I would like to buy an i20 as a second car mainly for the city and medium overland/BAB journeys. The following two engines come into question: i20 blue 1.2 with 84PS IO = 5.8 AO = 4.0 KOMBI = 4.7 KOMBI Spritmonitor = 6.24 CO2 = 109 control = 52€ i20 blue 1.0 T-GDI with 100PS IO = 5.3 AO = 3.6 KOMBI = 4.3 KOMBI Spritmonitor = 6.21 CO2 = 99 control = 28€ According to Spritmonitor.de, the two take nothing at all in consumption. The turbo is interesting because of only half of the tax per year. With an intended service life of at least 10 years, a tax saving of 240€. This is not the world. If you have a NON-Blue 1.2, it will be a little bit more. But it certainly goes down in the total cost. But for this I only have a 3-cylinder with turbo instead of 4-cylinder 1.2 suction cup. The 3-cylinder certainly runs much more unevenly, of that I am convinced. urbo certainly gives him good bangs from low rotational speeds and the torque is certainly quite conducive to progress. But the turbo is a part that can be broken after a few years. The problem does not have the 1.2er already. In addition, the problem with the fine dust with the turbo/direct injections. Who knows what our government and EU can come up with in the next few years – see Blue Environmental Zones etc.. In addition, it is the case that a turbo just at high speed I was able to observe this with my Golf IV 1.8T. Everything that went up from 150km/h he took good petrol. There were some same-volume vacuum cleaners at the same and higher speed less fuel consumption. OK the 1.8T also had 19″ with 225 tyres. The comparison lags somewhat, but basically 84 hp should however in the city always and also on the BAB for swimming with 130/1400 km/h completely enough. eis of approx. 1000 € for the 1.0T-GDI has to be brought in again, taking into account what could be with the Trubo times and especially since the consumption is real identical. The 1.2 is “old”-known and children’s diseases should be solved. What do you think? Greeting Dirk