With critical contributions – which are often completely justified – one obviously finds it extremely difficult with Motor-Talk. Then the question arises to me why this is actually so. I would like to take this only on one example (there are many more): Thus the article “Bad role models on television” in the area “Transport and safety” was deleted by a moderator with a justification, which is almost hanebüchen. The question, which was raised here, I find completely justified. Why should we not discuss exactly here – in this motorist forum – the content of car broadcasts and their “purpose”? If we are “editing” contributions that are devoted to a thousand times “the right oil” (sometimes there is no reference to the actual topic at all), then we should also leave such topics open for discussion, which are not “general blabla” (in the most nagative sense) e). Other reasons, which also lead here TO THE CONSOLIDATION of topics, without this being objectively justified, I deliberately do not address at this point, but there are them. I would be very interested in why topics are always closed AFTER LOVE (at least without objectively comprehensible reason). In any case, this concealment of your moderators has very little to do with journalistic culture.