We had a traffic accident two years ago, unfortunately no witnesses. The opponent drove over the traffic lights in red, but of course the opposite is true. Unfortunately, the accident expert could not prove our innocence either. We, because our traffic light had green, slowly hit and the other arrived at speed and moved over before a truck (so he could not The truck has unfortunately continued. Now my real question: Can’t an accident expert actually notice that if we had driven at speed, it would have a completely different impact on our car than if the opponent arrived at speed? Our car had axle fracture at the front left and…. Total damage! Unfortunately, we still don’t know what damage the opponent had. He could still drive, we couldn’t. Complicated or not. r? But maybe someone knows. Thanks already in advance Ulla