Improvements to the evaluation system

after you can already evaluate contributions for a little longer, some ideas that I could imagine could make the system more effective – currently a contribution red or green will be added from the first evaluation. I find this a bit premature, especially since the initially quite often commute back and forth. how about, for example, the color will be displayed from the 3rd evaluation onwards? then the first user can not immediately specify the initial color. – how about, if not only individual the average per contribution on green level 2 gets a corresponding green rating (similar to the star system based on the post count in other foren), who posts on average outet itself with corresponding red rating. – based on this user’s ‘view’ I would also like to see a weighting: someone who stays on average between red level 1 and 2 and who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person who is the person. the contribution of another should have imo a smaller influence than someone whose posts in average have a green level 3. so who has noticed often with helpful or substantial postings should imo be able to override one of many hated bullshit posters – and last but not least I would find a finer gradation, so -///+/++ better. currently you can only vote ‘extreme’.