Hello colleagues, I am interested in your experience of driving 600 and 1000 machines… At the moment I am driving a CBR 600 F, which I have chosen for myself as a beginner model. I am also very satisfied with the machine – but at some point I would like to develop myself on another machine over time. For example, I have already tested a few more 600 machines (Kawasaki, Triumph, CBR 600 RR) and must admit that, for example, e Daytona or RR – for me seen – are much more “beautiful” to drive and I would afterwards choose one of the above mentioned machines as an entry-level model (purchase decision for CBR 600 F was primarily the price and the “egg-legging woolen milk sow”. Also, I have already tested a 1000s, but honestly say that I had so much respect that I did not really feel the standard extra boost during the test drive. So now however to my contribution incentive : I intend to change at some point (i.e. further 600s, but then more sporty or 1000s -> stay with the “super athletes” and for this contribution the main argument should only be the risk of motorcycling of 600s vs. 1000s!! In other words, let us ignore the individual human character, we almost exclusively do not ride on the race track, ride quite carefully and do not put it on it and either 600s or 1000s (so no middle thing in Rich) So, if we just ignore the small secondary arguments… A colleague says, in some ways, that a 600 is more aggressive (i.e. more dangerous) due to the higher constant “speed” obligation; I just say “overpowering” is simply too easy/fast on a 1000er etc. Concretely: If I only look at the risk of driving in terms of PS/cubic performance, is driving with a 1000er much more risky???An answer in the direction “… then d If you don’t ride a motorcycle at all …” doesn’t help me for my thoughts… For helpful comments I thank you and wish you a nice start to the season!