I have now looked at various tests and reports on the new 1.6 SIDI. But somehow it makes me feel that the engine doesn’t make any economic sense for the buyer at all. I am speaking very precisely about the fact that it should “fuel” Super Plus. The consumption, exhaust and elasticities look quite ok at first, but we are talking here about a price difference of about 10 cents per litre at Super to Super Plus and even 15-20 cents for E10 to Super Pl So let’s take an Astra with 56l tank and the average ride with 15000 KM mileage per year. Thus, only the fuel results in higher operating costs of around 250€ per year compared to a current EcoTec. At 20,000 KM even the 2.0 CDTI may have almost amortized without counting it right now. Of course, according to the operating instructions, it can also be refuelled with super. But who guarantees me that the engine then after 4 years not the first n has engine damage? According to experience reports, the consumption of a Cascada with normal super is combined at around 9 liters. But that doesn’t really bother me now. So where is the argument for a SIDI?