I am a damaged person from the HUK. I had the door open in a parking bay and a young driver, who obviously just looked at the mobile phone, drove into the door. HUK refused the payment for the first time, because they said that I had to look at the door open that no traffic comes. But the door was already open for some time. But this only on the edge and the guilt question should not be solved here. I now have the following: I immediately, when I saw that the he is an accident opponent at the HUK, my lawyer turned on. He is now also filing a lawsuit. As usual, the driver, holder and insurance is sued. Now the driver and holder have gone to a lawyer themselves. Got the notification from my RA today. Should the RA of these not simply refer to the car insurance? Why does he accept it at all? Is the money-making from the RA or can it really bring them an advantage as if they I assume that the two of them just don’t know what to do in case of damage and have therefore gone to their own RA when the lawsuit came.