Hello everybody! So it’s about the above-mentioned motrorens, thought for the convertible. Which is the best compromise of driving performance and maintenance? Which is the BEST (can you say that at all?) ??? Sure, I thought the 2.8er has the most bangs, the 2.3er is the most economical. But is that really so? Yesterday I was just surfing around on the HP of a chip tuner for fun, and there stood at the consumption values WITHOUT power increase, that the 2.3er consumes more than the other two. Is that possible? So the smallest engine consumes the most? I know this has been chewed through a thousand times, but I want to know now exactly whether you can maintain these engines overhappy. I heard the 2.3er can swallow a lot but not, is that in some areas perhaps more economical? Is the consumption for the corresponding power ok? I mean a Honda v-tec with 150 or 160hp consumes by far less! Then the power. So especially a lot have the yes Not all for their displacement. I also heard that the 2.6 should be tired, and hardly drives better than the 2.3, only used up like the 2.8. What can you say about it? Then there was still with these data sheets that the 1.8 20V should have more torque than the 2.3. Real? How is the ratio with the weight?? So if you pull yourself in that the 2.5l of BMW 193PS, which the 2.8er nichma creates, then it seems poor to me at the first glance. Ciao Kersten