Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, it is actually more bearable what our politicians want to pull out of the driver’s pocket and into the diesel driver’s pocket. The reasons are becoming more and more strange and contradictory. The fact that the car tax is lowered does not believe that they themselves. Thus, a politician from the Greens said quite plainly – in the sense that “the lower mineral oil tax for diesel loses the state 6 billion euros a year” (Maybe I should tell her that ic h with the car tax for my diesel already financed half the construction of East alone ;-)) Anyway, one does not miss out on 6 billion, moreover, a failure in billions height is to be expected, if the citizen actually converts to ecodiesel. But only by the way: The nice Mr SPD politician who proposed this, said all serious, that all (in words all) diesel cars can tolerate ecodiesel. (I then send him the repair bill, if the diesel lines are in well-being. The drivers of older cars should not be additionally burdened financially. Dear politician: give me money and I upgrade! Now I also ask myself: if all this works with the eco-diesel, why should we be given something by lowering the car tax? That would be something new: taxes on diesel and car tax down? But by the way: Did anyone hear that there is now to be new eco-diesel, which should be 100% also with my little one (Bj. 89, 193,000 KM) WITHOUT retrofitting running? Greetings to all fuel oil Ferrari drivers Nicos