So, you didn’t want to do it any other way Since nobody was able to open a semi-exciting topic in the last 48 hours, it’s probably up to me to do it. As you all know (or not) our fine catalogue does not provide for linking the amount of fines to the perpetrator’s income (as it is common, for example, in criminal law, so that the perpetrator is actually punished). If you would rather welcome or reject a change in the fines based on daily rates (now it’s the case in criminal law). What advantages or disadvantages would you see? Since the topic was already then and when side issues, I have already taken up a few common criticisms and commented: 1. Unjust. Because everyone has committed the same transgression, everyone should pay the same amount. 2. Delimitation to “real” crimes is lost. 3. High administrative burden during the conversion. To 1: False, since A 100,- € fine punishes the H4ler much more strongly than the better earner with 5000,- € net income monthly. Zu 2: For “real” crimes there is still the possibility of imprisonment and the registration in the leadership certificate, which does not reasonably exist in the case of fines. Zu 3: The conversion is a one-time thing, which can be carried out due to the already existing fine structure relatively “administratively” (e.g. 1,- € fine corresponds to 0,1 And finally, something legal about the subject: §17 OWiG para. 3 would already provide a basis for the conversion if the last sentence were to be removed. Quotation: The basis for the measurement of the fine is the importance of the illegality and the accusation that hits the perpetrator. The economic conditions of the perpetrator are also considered; however, in the case of minor irregularities they are usually disregarded. a fair and exciting round of discussions.