Hello. Please take a look at my layman’s sketch (“Bild.jpg” – represents a current (now several years existing) situation in my place of residence. The question is quite simple: What permissible maximum speed is valid at the place with the red X? Of course I have looked at the relevant topics in the V&S before and found the following quote among other things. Quote: Route bans The route bans are essentially overtaking bans and A route ban does not automatically end at the next junction or junction, but in principle only when it is lifted by a designated cancellation mark. However, if a route ban is associated with a hazard sign (e.g. “construction site”, then it ends as soon as the corresponding danger point is over, even without an explicit cancellation mark. § 41 para. 2 no. 7: Route bans You restrict traffic to certain roads. The length of a ban route may be indicated at the beginning of an additional sign as … . The end of a ban route is not marked if the ban sign is affixed together with a hazard sign and the location is beyond doubt, from where the danger is no longer indicated . It is also not marked if the ban applies only for a short distance and the length of the ban route is indicated on an additional sign. S onst it is characterized by the signs 278, 279, 280; 281. Where all road bans end, the sign 282. These signs can also stand alone on the left. cf. Oberlandesgericht Hamm (VerkMitt 1996 Nr. 23 and Az. 2 Ss OWi 524/01) So for those who follow the green line on the right-hand side, 100. For those who follow the blue line on the straight way, continues to apply 70? There are no other traffic signs in the area that both lines share. Ok, a few kilometers further a local entrance sign comes again, but that is irrelevant. Your opinions? Thank you Bernd, who could not even get reliable information from the responsible road traffic office.