These titles are the purest fliers at the moment. more and more “tests” and evaluations of statistics get something as title – while at mt we drift more and more into a postmodern understanding of the car evaluation: an optimal car for all there is not, everything is subjective and car magazines are in first line for entertainment. really? times three left, which I noticed this evening: 1) autoindex ’06, norway: on the question, the price of your car ste he in a good verhæltnis to value, lie skoda, toyota, honda, saab and mazda close to a “ja”. mb, audi and chrysler drivers are of opinion, the offered qualitæt reflecte not the price. rust protection bemængeln ford, hyundai and mercedes-benz drivers are the most, the least criticized this topic is with owners of audi, volvo and saab. the fewest electronic problems there are probably at saab, bmw, honda, toyota, mazda, mitsubishi and nissan, most at citroën, peugeot u nd fiat. the service is, according to the question, the worst in people’s cars, best in toyota – where the satisfaction with prices is highest. 2) adac automarxx ’06: audio and other German make the race, volvo fills up due to low value loss. 3) at jd powers you can now compare cars from their database yourself. does anyone have ideas about how to find the ultimate best car now? which surveys, tests and statistics have to be included in the evaluation? ss oli, a bit unserious