on my vehicle was criticized that I did not have sufficient ground clearance. I have an advertisement because of violation of §19(2) and §30. my car is a traffic hazard because I have a lower ground clearance than 7 cm. the operating permit is extinguished. fact: I have an additional spoiler on the car, this is registered, had at the entry 6cm to the ground. at the entry of the chassis the spoiler was already on. the spoiler was registered to me several months later , I wanted to have that for safety. all minimum dimensions (rad middle/bördelkannte are adhered to) stand at the soft plastic spoiler to the floor are about 6cm. I have dealt extensively with the topic and am still of the opinion that my operating permit is not extinguished. I do not want to pay the fine of 50 euro and 3 points. can one help me further? objection I put in with the following reasons: – the vehicle was loaded – the area was not 100% just – the continued journey was not forbidden to me – not even the vehicle documents were checked on the spot – there is no paragraph that regulates a minimum ground clearance – a concrete case of a traffic danger is not available – I have the confirmation of the tuv that everything is ok – the tuv has entered the spoiler – I was already with the hu with the spoiler (without defects) – the suspension has already been registered with the installed spoiler – I have the court judgment of the olg köln zum erlischen der be – die registrte messungen gleich gleitt gleich with the settings of the suspension – 19(2)StVZO is already contradicted because the spoiler has been registered the objection is allegedly rejected, because my car has such a low spring path that it can not get 3cm deeper when loaded… this is how theachbearbbeiterin explained to me. the policeman will of course testify that the floor was just… another reason came to my mind later and indeed the vehicle was not completely springed out, by the previous aprupte brake the vehicle is springed in and thus deeper. this is quite common with such tough pressure steps as sports suspensions. would be great if one could help me further or had facts, court judgments or similar to this soch. PS: if there should be a lawyer among you, there must be no legal advice, it is enough if you explain to me what you would do if something like that happened to you… Urte il des OLG Hamm of 06.08.1999 Judgment of the BGH 3rd Civil Senate of 16 May 1991 Judgment of the Higher Regional Court Cologne of 28.03.1995 are known to me so far… and I find also helpful for me…