Moin together! I’m late. Was a long night yesterday with the Irish. After the fourth or fifth Guinness a moose-generated acquaintance had started a debate on Volvo and prices. In his opinion, V50 and XC90 would be surprisingly close together, which applies to prices and equipment. He referred to V50 T5 AWD and XC 90 2.5T. He claimed, according to equipment adjusted, there would be at most 5 kilos between the two. V70 somewhere in between. And in the leasing the There’s no difference in the headache. What’s the difference between a new-fashioned little elk… A loud outcry from the corner of the V50 dealer! That can’t be. His 2.0D is much cheaper than the XC90 D5. In the purchase and maintenance anyway. Pah, another said. The little extra weight, the 30cm longer length is cheaper if you can buy two additional seats for it. Says the next, 90% of his driving time he spent in the car alone anyway. Woz u so etc. etc. grumbles another, V70 is the only true moose, all other fashionable frills of money-grilled corporate bosses or Belgian focus-cut. What should I say. The evening pulled out, the opinions were constantly divided. Still some dark glass changed the owner. But before we could all fall off the chair, I promised to present the topic of the exhilarated MT-Gilde. What I do with this… Can I carry back any opinions again? three really so close together that the little one is not worth it? Have thanks ebilassio