Since this discussion was criticized in a different thread than off-topic, I’m going to open a new one. Background is that I’d like to compare Polestar 2. I was a little surprised to see that the Polestar in a YouTube test (see Range Thread) only creates 300km at 120kmh and good conditions. This results in a significantly higher consumption compared to Tesla. I found even more shocking that the consumption is similar to the EQC, which is often referred to as a flop. My expectation had been that the Polestar 2 would finally be a reasonable Tesla competitor compared to the German trials, but that this promise could not keep both in terms of updates, range/efficiency as well as production volume and charging curve. Android Automotive is also only a software for the headunit, but not for the whole car. This still consists of many different ECUs. Tesla has this almost everything in a central compu I don’t want the car to be the worst, much (e.g. operation, driving dynamics, processing) I also find it very successful, but it’s actually not really better than the German competitor and this was also disappointing for me. What reasons besides the quality of the workmanship and possibly the design (subjective) could one have to take the Polestar instead of the Model 3?