we will pass on this topic HERE: Quotation: Original written by haveitorhateit is a super argument or? in just under two years and 30,000km I can buy a lie for the loss of value (!) of a golf – so you should make advertising to think again: the loss of value says how much GELD (!) I have to pay in order to exchange my used car for a new value, or? so in case of the logan I would have to pay for about 3,90€ after about 2 years + 30,000km 8400€ to drive with a new car from the farm. why you always expect to have stupid percentages is personally grinding, but so probably the German manufacturers try to sell their high prices better. nevertheless (to get back to the point): the logan has the PROZENTUAL and the ABSOLUT better value loss, so why should I not repeat a sentence like “the Dacia is a good (but not stable) car”? because this statement i In fact, it’s totally wrong!