today the adac has probably published its unusable cannon list again. in the context I looked at other lists again and somehow seems to play always a random random element with in. 1) Similar to the tuev-rapport has the Swedish “bilprövningen” lists about the average errors of different vehicle models. here the press report with link to 3-, 7- and 10-jæhrigen vehicles. volvo is usually above average good, but top There are no placements. 2) the same list converted to the average mileage of seven-year-old models is available here (number of errors – high is good, percentage of failed vehicles, average mileage, number of controlled vehicles). this results in total toyota dominance, with a volvo only on the 55th place. awesome! 3) the current numbers of warranty direct (gb) from the february. which insure up to ten-year-old cars mi t under 100000 miles of running power, almost a kind of new vehicle warranty. it revolves around 450000 vehicles whose errors were registered within nine years. Mazda (8.0%), honda (8.9%) and toyota (15.8%) are at the top of the list, the koreans beat well and volvo lands far behind in a 22nd place with 31,3%, after bmw and mb, before audi, folk cars and saab (click/text). so. dear gruss oli