The smaller the diesel engines, the bigger the problem, or the deviation from test bench theory and practice. Volvo goes to Spain to allow the models in Europe. (Honi soit qui mal y pense). Maybe there is no measuring device in Sweden? CO2 values: there is no blindness, who believes the Volvo factory specifications. An 181 hp 4×4 XC70 should be mobile with 5.2 total consumption? Bla Bla. OK, it seems up to now not fraud, but only T No, more serious – the nitrogen oxide issue is serious and not the CO2. The question is this: the vehicles are in theory always cleaner, but the measuring points in the inner cities have been measuring the approximately same values of nitrogen oxides for years. This is the simple environmental truth. And that’s not because simply more cars would drive. But for the most part because the measuring points measure very “practically” and the cars “theoretically” let us In fact, I can still feel that a city government is considering tougher measures. All under Euro 6 diesel from the centers – I would not be surprised by such demands over the next two years. Anyway: The values that should not be exceeded in practical measurements from 2017 – I know – is still everything (press) talk and nothing decided – I have a hard impression that the Euro 5 diesel from Volvo could look old if e For all those like me who want to drive XC70 for many years, we don’t have a very pleasant perspective. We don’t have a petrol alternative. (And I like the Tucker-D5 from Volvo with the rough kind and power). More specifically: can you even buy a 2012 XC70 D5 (before the rather painful downsizing for me) and think that you can still drive with it everywhere in 6 or 8 years? Who knows more about Volvo-D5 – Euro 5 – nitrogen oxide?