How good the new CR-V is, seems to surprise even the rec players of the Auto-Motor-Sport. Only in this way can I explain that the CR-V in the current edition is spoken in places with stupid examples bad. It is about the design at the beginning, according to the author without character. I can’t understand at all, clearly design is subjective, but would nevertheless claim that the absolute majority finds the CRV very good. The author even thinks that Mazda and Toyota have a better design language…ts Then, strangely, the 2.2 diesel is spoken badly, the “could be a little less consuming and more cultivated like the TDIs of VW” is called meaningfully. At the same time, the AMS has called the engine in the Accord once exactly as “world’s best diesel engine”. In conclusion, the price comes to the speech: “35,000 EUR, that was once 70,000 DM”. Such a weakness, to take into account at all. Of course, the CRV is not a super fast, but two pages is about a permanent test, but the price of the A-V.