A hello to the moderators and the motor talk team, how do the moderators actually make decisions and how are they legitimized or monitored? Suppose a user does not behave in accordance with the NUB from a moderator’s point of view. Then the moderator discusses this with the other colleagues or can he directly lock them or pronounce a temporary driving ban? What happens if the moderator’s decision is considered inappropriate by the person concerned or even by several users? d. How is this problem solved then? Isn’t it also useful if threatening barriers are always discussed with the user and other moderators before they are executed? In real life one can always express oneself to the allegations. The volunteer moderator is certainly not a free letter to do and let what comes into the mind of a moderator, because it should be based on reciprocity, which is in the interest of all, because without moderators here would quickly chaos h I will certainly not mention any names here, because I am not concerned with specific cases, but I would like to clarify the basics here so that I can understand the connections better.