Red Aygo clear-lacquer damage!

Hello everyone at our red Aygo (BJ 9/’06) about a year ago the clear varnish on the front apron threw bubbles and burst off. At Toyota we were told that the stone strokes were. They destroy the lacquer layer, water penetrates in and the varnish bursts off. But we did not want to be satisfied with this, because stone strokes are good and beautiful (in every car), but they destroy not only the clear varnish layer (base varnish is ok) and above all not in (in the meantime) cake plategr after research on the Internet (the damage is probably heaped up) we put pressure on Toyota and they admitted that this is happening with the red Aygos. Reason was that red is simply a bad paint to paint. With the offer of an apron of a white Aygo (which we should have painted ourselves) the thing was done for Toyota. But we did not want to (always) content ourselves with it yet and made further pressure (cann’t be that Toyota is badly painted and we can’t do that with other red cars!). Our car dealership then contacted Brussels (although the seat of a place that can make such decisions), but from there all actions on the part of Toyota were rejected, no culant… This is the last contact with Toyota for the time being. But it gets worse and worse (Figure 1, 2) and now the same fun starts at the rear apron (Picture 3) and at the painted exterior mirrors. In addition, there are places where the clear layer is completely intact and “only” replaces (Fig. 5) We are quite acidic and will probably never be able to buy from Toyota or recommend it!! The “rest” of the car is in a top condition, has aluminium rims, a standing heater, is maintained. Actually we wanted to sell it soon, just not that! And somehow it’s also about the principle! My question(s) now:- Did you have similar He experiences? – What did Toyota do (or not)? – Do you still have an idea what we can do? – I have gelsene that Toyota only clearly foils (i.e. the clear varnish layer is not, but only a foil). That this then quickly dissolves with bad underground adhesion is logical. Is that true? Thank you very much!