I always land at a Potenza. So the trip Pilot sport3 was just so lala, the tire was too average for the short durability. The Conti sportcontact2 was not able to suffer and the Goodyear Eagle F1 ruined the driving behaviour of the BMW (too much understeering). I already know the RE050a. Durability mau (Treadwear 140), but for that he glued like chewing gum and also endured heat and stress without falling into shreds. I would take it again, but more than 10,000km durability on the drive axle this time would be class Den Potenza S001 I also had and it really held twice as long (Treadwear280) as the RE050a, but for that small losses in cold and generally 10…20% little grip in dryness. There was something missing of the bite. Of the profile are S001 and RE050a very similar (negative part), have attached a picture. Where now the RE002 adrenaline lands. Let’s look at the data. Treadwear 220, i.e. between RE050a and S001 It should offer a good 50% more durability than the 050a. The profile has a less negative part than the two tires of the photo, which again speaks for dry grip and something against aquaplaning. Maybe nuances, but it is the youngest in the bundle. Maybe it offers the grip of the RE050a with improved durability? Long speech short sense, who knows both or a comparison in any forum or trade sheet? On the Bridgestone page are all 3 “equal-good”, the marketing shovel uses nothing. Also emails could be answered only insufficiently. Thank you!