Hello, I had an “accident” some time ago on a resting place. There an employee of the state company for mobility Rhineland-Palatinate caused a paint and sheet metal damage to my then 6 month old vehicle. This was created by a stone which was hurled against my vehicle during mowing work. On site everything was clarified with the help of the police. Then I went to my dealer to obtain an estimate. I have sent the estimate to the national company for Mobiliät RLP and proposed to dispense with a person in kind and to estimate 20% of the invoice amount (1000 euros) as a reduction in value. (As I have already feared there are problems… no wonder… Koblenz halt) It was “in fact after” complied with and an expert was not necessary because of the amount of the damage. In the meantime the vehicle was leased and painted and also the Re BUT now there is no compensation for the depreciation since the invoice amount is too small. With reference to a marginal note to a comment from 2011. I wrote to them immediately that you should explain this to me more precisely because according to common jurisprudence (my knowledge) the mercantile inferior value is not to be fixed at the invoice amount and since the vehicle was leased (no matter to what extent) in any case an Anspruc h to compensate for the depreciation. It is, as I said, a rather expensive new car. Since to say a mercantile inferior value is only from 10% of the list price there is a boldness. But the people there are stubborn, the head of the speaker now even claims things that are demonstrably lied and I should nevertheless turn on a lawyer. A boldness without equal… My question is now how I can prove the mercantile inferior value. On an expert was in And above all, what I can do without using a lawyer. After all, it’s an authority… Can I ask to pass the matter on to the next higher authority. A speaker’s head doesn’t really have anything to say… And a lawyer for 200 euros is uneconomical. But that’s exactly what the authority is speculating on… LG Jens