Hello, after we have driven 20 years Hondas (accords) and in 20 years only 800 € for repairers, which were not wear substitutes (attention, watch your TIGUAN and anything else- driver, there is only one thing from Japan!) we dared the CR-V-Acquisition (year of construction 2009, 2,0 L gasoline, automatic with AHK). A in all ages higher price than the RAV 4, but far cheaper than the TIGUAN, which I would have liked to have had. Had it been! I’m glad to have no VW. And the value loss of a CR-V is for me as a used car buyer and long driver, just good! Of course, the terrain tests are nothing for the Honda. But I’m also not an alpine skier who, as in the latest test of motor sport, basically has to ski up the ski slope in the ski area, by car, of course, not by lift. That’s where the new CR-V 4 (place 10 out of 10) also fails. And maybe i ch also not at all in the tank training area drive through hip-high mud, like the Jeeps and RangeRovers. So if you are sure to drive on poorly paved paths, want to move your caravan with speedo-120 km/h over the highway, or the WoWa from a wet meadow, you must be pretty stupid to acquire an overpriced image name from Deuztschland and because it is so nice to visit its dealer in a certain regularity (see TIGUAN forum). Only for the foresters among us, or the horses. drivers, or the builders of new nuclear power plants on muddy construction sites, you buy your Touaregs, Q5 or something, or drive up the ski slopes if you are allowed. After 4 months I know: once Honda, always Honda, especially if it is a CR-v!