For an acquaintance who asked me to assist him in the handling of his liability damage, one question is: First: Debt distribution is undisputed, 100 : 0 The damaged vehicle was delivered in the car dealership with the order to order an expert because there is a suspicion of an economic total damage. The employee of the car dealership was then of the opinion that the full accident assistance program should be rewinded, including the lawyer, car rental and all possible assignments In the first place, the lawyer and the car hire company was slowed down, the former because he is not known to us and I doubted the car hire with the indication that the vehicle was safe for operation and traffic and the insurance company would possibly refuse to pay for the car hire. The vehicle is also safe for operation and traffic, except that the tailgate cannot be opened easily. I find the explanation absolutely inconvenient, since an emergency repair would be enough to keep the door open and even if not, that is an absolutely insidious attempt to bring an overpriced rental car to the man at the expense of the acquaintance in the dispute. How do the experts see this, am I wrong ?