Hello, I got a subpoena from the police because of the above topic. Briefly to the thing: An accident happened allegedly. DEr Klagmann/Woman finds allegedly red paint marks on his car. After questioning in a shop say “the” people from the shop: yes here is a red car parked in the area. 7 days later then the police found on my car adäqate accident marks. I park in this area regularly. A Kitz in ener Stadt. Now I was already to the subpoena and 1. Where should the accident have happened:::::: no answer, only the road was told to me. 2. I wanted to see pictures of the process. I saw a gunned VW with a damage at the front part as a kind of paint damage. The picture was taken under backlight in the evening hours and looked very blurred, so I could not see exactly how exactly the accident damage was. 3. I asked for “my” car damage. I was shown a picture, what light paint was This paint damage was on the wheel box with soft plastic. No bumps. I was able to take pictures of the “crack car”, I was not allowed to take photos of mine. Now everything seems to be drawn to whether the prosecutor can accuse me of a “crack” to tell me that I should have heard it. If I go out of “my car damage (and that’s what I can do so far because I can look at it) so should vo My big question now here: Who knows about such “tables”, where could I get hints on how big a damage that must be heard by a driver? I was also still in this shop what is in the road. They said nothing about an accident. a later telofinic contact with the “criminal side” resulted. I asked if I could visit the car: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. in, it’s all already repaired in connection with another damage to the same car.” my insurance company still has no news of this incident.