A few weeks ago I drove out of my driveway to the road (residential area, speed 30), while looking around through the side lights everything was still free. At night it had frozen and I had to scratch all the windows before. When I was standing on the road, I could not see anything at first, disc started to fog again, sun blinded at eye level and I stayed still short as one drove on from behind me. He had his front window only partially fret After getting out, he was probably asleep and didn’t see me. Probably at the same time as I was out of a parking lot, which is why I didn’t see him at first and I bet he couldn’t see anything out of his ice palace in the deep sun, but he left for the first time. In the accident, he had caught a little bump on his nose (he probably stuck right behind his disc), so he called the police. The police said that I was probably to blame for driving backwards into the flowing traffic, and there was still something to do with me (negligent assault, etc.), but they were not sure what led to an investigation. I had at least denied all the blame from the beginning. I then asserted my claims with the opposing insurance company, i.e. n a few days later, a shred came, in which she refused because according to her “existing objective documents” (which may be?) a liability of her customer would not be in question, since I was responsible for the accident. Now last week a letter came from the prosecutor, after the proceedings against me according to §46 para. 1 OwiG had been stopped in connection with §170 para. StPO, which does not mean that a fault cannot be proved to me. My car should be an economic total damage, old rusty Escort, value max. 1,000 euros, is it worth it to hire a lawyer (procedural cost risk)? Greetings Bullerbock