Since one sees the rule of law Ö….I like a Ri..ter decides on a won internet auctions. Yesterday after 1 year’s dispute district court W…. ended with a comparison unintentionally expensive comparison. Guilty sentence: Although won internet auction, to the favor of the auctioner. Prehistory: H.T had offered an outdated engine with all the attachments at an internet auction around 100.-€ the Hr S.R. as the only bidder.. the engine did not come out because He had allegedly been wrong at the auction with the offer price and had already sold him around 900.- and therefore no longer would have. After several e-mails write back and forth he could still acquire the engine not by 100.- but by 900.- but still. Although there was an auction title, after several months of writing there was a lawsuit at the court. Applicable value of the engine 3000.-€ court hearing : 1 A comparison was sought the Hr H.T u his right 5months passed court hearing: 2 (days) hearing by the judge of the defendant and defendant. The judge then said that the value of the engine was far higher than that of the refused price of 100.-€ and from another appreciation ( 3-4000.-€ ) and therefore the wrongdoing of the defendant was present at the offer and accepted this. Any attempt to point out the applicable auction conditions were reduced It was suggested under Duck of the judge that the defendant would have bad cards to assert his claim and that he would have to bear today’s court costs of more than €2000.- in case of a negative verdict. Next instance in case of negative verdict 4000.- + attorney’s fees of the defendant. After a consultation break with his lawyer, the latter then agreed the comparison looks as follows: increased engine instead of un 100.- now 450.-€ + Ger costs Complaints about 1100.- + incurred legal costs estimated at 2500.- for an engine that you had originally bought by 100.-. Conclusion: Even if you are 100% sure to have purchased an article cheaply still does not mean that you get right. There are actually the general terms and conditions (legal situation) for internet transactions for Sc….e what do you think about it?