Dear users, with dismay I notice that, to an increasing extent, contributions in various areas are moving orthographically and grammatically at a level that is similar to that in the special school or in citizens with a migrant background. Can it really be so difficult to pay attention to a certain minimum of spelling and grammar when creating contributions, so that the contributions are at least half-readable? No one will lose a word about it if m But if sentences appear completely meaningless and reading the contributions is more like a guessing game, something can’t be true. Even worse, the linguistic disaster culminates in this, which is defended by some moderators. So I could read the other day in a meaningful way: “whether the contribution is so easy to read, doesn’t matter, mainly it contributes to the topic.” Whether this is necessarily conducive to the quality of MT t? But it’s even better. I really dared to draw the attention of one or the other user to his written errors, admittedly, to my own subtle way. To thank for this, I received, among other things, a PN of the moderator Tecci, in which he gave me a ban on writing for the Porsche Forum. Although I have indeed been warned several times about other things, I think that it can’t be because of the rule of law. This means that the moderators actually throw all the facts into a pot, stir them vigorously in it and proceed according to Schema F. Rather, it seems to me that one tries here in as simple a way as possible, to me as perhaps a somewhat uncomfortable user, who often writes the one or other helpful post, but does not so easily get the mouth of each of them. In this particular case, the above-mentioned moderator clearly acted purely arbitrarily, especially since I dared to speak again after his hint in the corresponding thread. If necessary, the one or other moderator should sometimes reconsider the way in which he deals with the users, through the latter the forum lives at all. But with 1.3 million users probably plays the once-in-a-lifetime moderator. I’m afraid it’s a minor part. Well, I’ve done what I had to say. And now I look forward to my lock, which finally confirms my assumption that there is pure arbitrariness here. Best regards Wolfman34