For example, when ebay offers more and more of it, I have to say what many people don’t know: every lassed rear light is invalid in any case. Why? Because luminaires require type approvals and as soon as something is changed on a type approval lamp (e.g. lassed, magnification of the hole cut-out for other pears, gluing, etc.) the EC/ECE approval/type approval is extinguished. Furthermore, there is no possibility (e.g. by an expert report, change). In addition to a new type approval for which, among other things, a light-technical report from the Lichttechnische Institut in Karlsruhe or Berlin is required (the costs for this alone, according to DEKRA, are in the 4-digit range). This means that even if a “expert opinion” on the luminaires is supplied, this does not change the inadmissibility. Above all, because it is almost always the well-known “Muschwitz-Gu” In this case, according to TÜV-Süddeutschland, this is invalid for several reasons, so that there is talk of the replacement of the serial light and not of the change of it – apart from the fact that this is only a preliminary report. I have also seen DEKRA change acceptances which refer to this report and which confirm the road safety of the vehicle. In such a case, the examiner made a mistake, w For many, registration/change acceptance is also legally invalid. For many, registration/change acceptance is sufficient to calm the conscience, but in the case of a case, the insurance companies are hard-hitting -> found eating when it comes to paying. So you can only use the notes to blind police officers during a check. So: If you have a lasered lamp, you have an invalid lamp! Even if it is registered, you also have retro-reflectors a n’s car snaps and the illumination is good in itself. If you’re wondering why I’ve dealt with it so closely -> I let myself turn on such lights, supposedly with ABE, instead these windy notes were there.